Newshot
Account

Carlo Rovelli says fundamental physics is overrated

Summary

Nature, Published online: 09 November 2026; doi:10.1038/d41586-026-03626-7 The theoretical physicist unpacks the need for more humility in science and whether artificial intelligence could ever become conscious.

Original text(via Nature)
Portrait of Carlo Rovelli standing among suspended wooden and metal sculptures.
Portrait of Carlo Rovelli standing among suspended wooden and metal sculptures.

Carlo Rovelli is a physicist and writer whose research focuses on quantum theories of gravity. Credit: David Stock/eyevine

On the Equality of All Things: Physics and Philosophy Carlo Rovelli Allen Lane (2026)

Physicist Carlo Rovelli has spent much of his career working on the theory of quantum gravity, which seeks to reconcile quantum mechanics with the general theory of relativity. But, as he explores in his latest book, On the Equality of All Things, he is increasingly pondering an even bigger question: whether there is an ultimate description of reality at all.

You used to think physics could offer an account of reality. What changed?

I think physics is a fabulous enterprise, but the world is more complicated than just a fundamental equation. It is genuinely complex, which means that understanding the basic rules doesn’t tell us much about understanding the phenomena that we are interested in.

In the book, I say that fundamental physics is overrated. High-energy physics, particle physics, quantum gravity — it’s great science. I love it. It’s fantastic. It tells us something about the world. But stop thinking that it is the root of everything else.

Why bad philosophy is stopping progress in physics

Why shouldn’t we think like that?

My work is on quantum gravity, trying to write a theory that describes gravitational phenomena for which quantum theory cannot be disregarded. I find it super interesting because it pushes us to rethink reality. But I think it is a mistake to see physics as getting to the ultimate reality. The question of whether there is an ultimate reality is a bad question. ‘Ultimate’ doesn’t mean anything. Generality doesn’t mean better understanding.

I go running in the morning, and I try to run faster and faster. I have an objective to run faster, but that does not mean I want to reach the speed of light. In the same way, I want to know more about the world, but the very idea of knowing the ultimate reality seems an illusion and part of a world view that I think we should drop.

Do you think the field of physics suffers from hubris?

Yes, I think it does. I don’t think it is a particularly serious sin, but it has created problems for physics. Physicists have oversold the field, sometimes with good motivation. I think about theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking saying “philosophy is dead now”. This has created a colossal push against science, which I think is bad. People say: “Come on, you scientists pretended to be the arbiters of reality. You’re not.”

Physicists disagree wildly on what quantum mechanics says about reality, Nature survey shows

Why does that matter?

I think a lot of the physics literature is wasted, as well as some experimental efforts. Look how much experimental effort has been put into checking theories that then didn’t work. The most striking example has been supersymmetry (which predicts a partner particle for each of the basic building blocks of matter). How could the entire community be almost certain that a class of phenomena existed, only to have it shown empirically that it does not exist? We have to find the cracks in our knowledge, rather than making random choices.

You say that we can describe the world only from a particular perspective. Doesn’t that make reality subjective?

Perspectivalism does not mean subjectivity. That is the point. There is nothing special about humans. We are just physical systems, like anything else. Yes, any account of reality needs to have a perspective, but it doesn’t need to be a human one. The Moon has one velocity with respect to Earth and a different velocity with respect to the Sun. It’s all relational. Not because there is a human observing it, but because velocity really is relative.

Abstract black-and-white view of a mirrored high-rise building facade.
Abstract black-and-white view of a mirrored high-rise building facade.

According to perspectivalism, people cannot formulate an ultimate description of reality.Credit: Getty

How might such a view change our thinking?

For me, the key is quantum mechanics. The theory works really well, but it is still confusing. There are several ways to make sense of quantum mechanics, and they can be divided into two classes. One involves theories that assume a framework of knowledge beyond what we can see (such as the many-worlds, universal-wave-function and hidden-variables theories).

The alternative, which I think is more scientifically fruitful and reasonable, says that quantum mechanics is telling us something deep about the world, namely that you should not ask what is really, really going on, because that’s a bad question.

What could convince you that your interpretation is wrong?

One way would be to make an experiment that contradicts quantum mechanics. But it is often not crucial experiments that decide what we think is true. It’s a piling up of evidence. Some ways of thinking show themselves to be much more fruitful than others. Science is not only writing equations, checking predictions and discarding equations that give incorrect predictions. It also means evolving our general conceptual structure.

Enjoying our latest content? Log in or create an account to continue

  • Access the most recent journalism from Nature's award-winning team
  • Explore the latest features & opinion covering groundbreaking research

Nature 659, 296-298 (2026)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-026-03626-7

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

Competing Interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Related Articles

  • Why bad philosophy is stopping progress in physics
  • Physicists disagree wildly on what quantum mechanics says about reality, Nature survey shows
  • Why even physicists still don’t understand quantum theory 100 years on
  • Do our observations make reality happen?

Subjects

  • Quantum physics

Latest on:

  • Quantum physics
  • Extraordinary materials shaped by the principles of complex networks News & Views 11 NOV 26

Extraordinary materials shaped by the principles of complex networks

News & Views 11 NOV 26

  • Observation of prethermal dynamical phase transitions and resonant melting Article 04 NOV 26

Observation of prethermal dynamical phase transitions and resonant melting

Article 04 NOV 26

  • Subcycle videography of Landau–Zener–Majorana transitions in graphene Article 28 OCT 26

Subcycle videography of Landau–Zener–Majorana transitions in graphene

Article 28 OCT 26

  • Three reasons why AI is not conscious and perhaps never will be Comment 19 OCT 26

Three reasons why AI is not conscious and perhaps never will be

Comment 19 OCT 26

  • What happens in Vegas: one lecturer’s hunt for a projector News & Views 22 SEP 26

What happens in Vegas: one lecturer’s hunt for a projector

News & Views 22 SEP 26

  • The Einstein test: what happens when AI tries to rediscover relativity? News Feature 09 SEP 26

The Einstein test: what happens when AI tries to rediscover relativity?

News Feature 09 SEP 26

Jobs

  • Bioinformatician – Long-Read Genomics, Pangenomics and Precision Medicine Talented bioinformatician with expertise in the analysis of long-read genomic and multi-omics sequencing data, genome assembly, and pangenomics. Doha (QA) Sidra Medicine Qatar

Bioinformatician – Long-Read Genomics, Pangenomics and Precision Medicine

Talented bioinformatician with expertise in the analysis of long-read genomic and multi-omics sequencing data, genome assembly, and pangenomics.

Sidra Medicine Qatar

  • Associate or Senior Editor, Communications AI & Computing Job Title: Associate or Senior Editor, Communications AI & Computing Locations: Shanghai, Beijing, Pune, New Delhi, Berlin or Madrid (hybrid) Appli... Shanghai, Beijing, Pune, New Delhi, Berlin or Madrid (hybrid) Springer Nature Ltd

Associate or Senior Editor, Communications AI & Computing

Job Title: Associate or Senior Editor, Communications AI & Computing Locations: Shanghai, Beijing, Pune, New Delhi, Berlin or Madrid (hybrid) Appli...

Shanghai, Beijing, Pune, New Delhi, Berlin or Madrid (hybrid)

Springer Nature Ltd

  • Postdoctoral Fellow Postdoctoral Fellow focus on ferroic smart materials: shape-memory alloys, piezoelectric ceramics, and magnetostrictive materials, etc Ningbo, Zhejiang (CN) Center for Advanced Smart Materials (CASM), Yongjiang Laboratory (Y-Lab)

Postdoctoral Fellow

Postdoctoral Fellow focus on ferroic smart materials: shape-memory alloys, piezoelectric ceramics, and magnetostrictive materials, etc

Ningbo, Zhejiang (CN)

Center for Advanced Smart Materials (CASM), Yongjiang Laboratory (Y-Lab)

  • Principal Investigator/ Associate Professor PI & Associate Professor class focus on innovative research about ferroic smart materials or technology transfer Ningbo, Zhejiang (CN) Center for Advanced Smart Materials (CASM), Yongjiang Laboratory (Y-Lab)

Principal Investigator/ Associate Professor

PI & Associate Professor class focus on innovative research about ferroic smart materials or technology transfer

Ningbo, Zhejiang (CN)

Center for Advanced Smart Materials (CASM), Yongjiang Laboratory (Y-Lab)

  • Open-Rank Faculty Position in Basic Biomedical Research WashU Medicine’s Dept of Anesthesiology seeks applicants for a tenure-track or tenured faculty position in the Division of Basic Research. Saint Louis, Missouri WashU Medicine - Anesthesiology

Open-Rank Faculty Position in Basic Biomedical Research

WashU Medicine’s Dept of Anesthesiology seeks applicants for a tenure-track or tenured faculty position in the Division of Basic Research.

Saint Louis, Missouri

WashU Medicine - Anesthesiology

The text above was extracted automatically from the source page and may miss images, tables or code blocks. The original is authoritative.

Published by Nature
This site only summarises and aggregates; copyright stays with the original author. Headlines and summaries follow the source — where they differ, the original wins.
Read the original ↗