Newshot
Account

Metascience should be a source of evidence, not a means of control

Summary

Nature, Published online: 10 November 2026; doi:10.1038/d41586-026-03620-z The field has captured the interest of politicians. There are positives — but governments must not misuse the data.

Original text(via Nature)
Printing blocks spelling ‘Evidence based science’.
Printing blocks spelling ‘Evidence based science’.

Efforts to apply metascience to research funding must put evidence and scientists front and centre.Credit: Alamy

The European Research Council made headlines last month when the news broke that those applying for one of its core grants had only a 5% chance of success. Partly as a result of applicants using artificial intelligence, the ratio of submissions to grants at the European Union’s premier science funder is now so skewed as to be little more than a lottery. Some funders are already using lotteries to select grant recipients, viewing these as a fairer way to allocate funding.

More self-reflection in research can lead to better science

This is not a coincidence. The idea of distributing certain types of grant randomly has been tested experimentally over a number of years. It’s one example of how the field of metascience — the study of the practice of science itself — is having a real-world impact.

Metascience is not new. The world’s oldest journal devoted to the study of science, Nauka Polska, based in Poland, was founded in 1918 and is still publishing. Nature frequently reports on metascience, invites researchers to share their opinions and publishes primary science in the field. A set of studies released in April, for example, investigated the reproducibility, replicability and robustness of research in the social and behavioural sciences1–4. Developments in research funding, research organization, communication and evaluation are all aspects of metascience.

Metascience is also used by governments to support policy and funding decisions. In the past few years, a number of governments have established and funded metascience research units, as detailed in Seize the Meta Moment, a review by an international group of researchers and policymakers that was published last week by the Research on Research Institute in London (see go.nature.com/4z7pdt1). The author list includes members of some of these government-funded metascience units.

Huge meta-research project puts claims in social-science papers to the test

In one sense, this is positive, an example of policymakers seeking solutions informed by research. But the review’s authors point out that political attention also introduces risks — namely that the discipline could be misused to serve government agendas or to justify decisions that are not supported by a consensus of the evidence. They acknowledge that metascience will, to some extent, always be political, but that this should be acknowledged. And they urge politicians to use metascience as a learning tool and a source of evidence, but not as a means of controlling researchers.

In the United States, the Office of Science and Technology Policy has tasked all federal science agencies with establishing metascience capabilities. This was outlined in a July report, Science: A New Golden Age, which criticized excessive bureaucracy and slowness in US science, and embraced the idea of accelerating grant-awarding processes (see go.nature.com/3uj6pf5). One concern is that the US administration could use metascience to push through major changes, such as funding cuts, support for higher-risk research or the adoption of AI, without engaging the broader scientific community.

I built the UK government’s metascience unit — here’s what countries need to know

The United States is not the only country where researchers are worried about potential metascience misuse; concerns have also been raised in the United Kingdom, the first country to establish a government metascience unit. Last year, the nation’s main public funder of social science, the Economic and Social Research Council, announced a commitment to promoting economic growth. This is part of a broader economic push by the nation’s main public funder, UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), in response to a government priority.

The extent to which publicly funded science contributes to growth and the mechanisms underlying it are well-studied questions in the social sciences, and there are a range of views both supporting and critiquing the UK government’s objectives. It’s important that funders such as UKRI do not align themselves with just one view, and that the metascience unit does not reduce measurement of grant recipients’ performance to a metric that is itself still a matter of debate in the research community.

Why science has a credibility problem — and how to address it

Most of the world’s science funding agencies were established when research careers were accessible to relatively few people. There is now a much larger and more mobile pool of researchers due, in part, to the expansion of universities and the globalization of science. Funding agencies need to change how they work to adapt as the world changes. That includes addressing the problem of falling success rates resulting from the greater demand for grants.

By far the best way for policymakers to use metascience to inform funding decisions is for them to work with researchers to create and implement tools designed to measure quality and competitiveness, and — as in science itself — to learn from experimentation and experience.

Nature 659, 272 (2026)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-026-03620-z

References

  • Tyner, A. H. et al. Nature 652, 143–150 (2026).Article PubMed Google Scholar

Tyner, A. H. et al. Nature 652, 143–150 (2026).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

  • Aczel, B. et al. Nature 652, 135–142 (2026).Article PubMed Google Scholar

Aczel, B. et al. Nature 652, 135–142 (2026).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

  • Miske, O. et al. Nature 652, 126–134 (2026).Article PubMed Google Scholar

Miske, O. et al. Nature 652, 126–134 (2026).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

  • Brodeur, A. et al. Nature 652, 151–156 (2026).Article PubMed Google Scholar

Brodeur, A. et al. Nature 652, 151–156 (2026).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Reprints and permissions

Related Articles

  • I built the UK government’s metascience unit — here’s what countries need to know
  • Huge meta-research project puts claims in social-science papers to the test
  • ‘Replication games’ test the robustness of social-science studies
  • Why science has a credibility problem — and how to address it
  • More self-reflection in research can lead to better science

Subjects

  • Scientific community
  • Research data
  • Research management

Latest on:

  • How I balance my life as a professional surfer and a university researcher Career Column 11 NOV 26

How I balance my life as a professional surfer and a university researcher

Career Column 11 NOV 26

  • Author or just ‘acknowledged’? How women are not gaining full credit for research Nature Index 11 NOV 26

Author or just ‘acknowledged’? How women are not gaining full credit for research

Nature Index 11 NOV 26

  • Retractions of old papers are on the rise: when should bad science be culled? News Feature 11 NOV 26

Retractions of old papers are on the rise: when should bad science be culled?

News Feature 11 NOV 26

  • These three red flags could unmask dodgy journals News 28 OCT 26

These three red flags could unmask dodgy journals

News 28 OCT 26

  • How to compare and strengthen research systems World View 19 OCT 26

How to compare and strengthen research systems

World View 19 OCT 26

  • PhD students who write dissertations with AI less likely to stay in academia News 16 OCT 26

PhD students who write dissertations with AI less likely to stay in academia

News 16 OCT 26

  • Give biologists the space to be curious, not just better tools World View 11 NOV 26

Give biologists the space to be curious, not just better tools

World View 11 NOV 26

  • PhD funding mechanisms should protect the right to disagree with supervisors Correspondence 10 NOV 26

PhD funding mechanisms should protect the right to disagree with supervisors

Correspondence 10 NOV 26

  • What postdoc ads ask for and what they leave unsaid Career Column 09 NOV 26

What postdoc ads ask for and what they leave unsaid

Career Column 09 NOV 26

Jobs

  • Bioinformatician – Long-Read Genomics, Pangenomics and Precision Medicine Talented bioinformatician with expertise in the analysis of long-read genomic and multi-omics sequencing data, genome assembly, and pangenomics. Doha (QA) Sidra Medicine Qatar

Bioinformatician – Long-Read Genomics, Pangenomics and Precision Medicine

Talented bioinformatician with expertise in the analysis of long-read genomic and multi-omics sequencing data, genome assembly, and pangenomics.

Sidra Medicine Qatar

  • Associate or Senior Editor, Communications AI & Computing Job Title: Associate or Senior Editor, Communications AI & Computing Locations: Shanghai, Beijing, Pune, New Delhi, Berlin or Madrid (hybrid) Appli... Shanghai, Beijing, Pune, New Delhi, Berlin or Madrid (hybrid) Springer Nature Ltd

Associate or Senior Editor, Communications AI & Computing

Job Title: Associate or Senior Editor, Communications AI & Computing Locations: Shanghai, Beijing, Pune, New Delhi, Berlin or Madrid (hybrid) Appli...

Shanghai, Beijing, Pune, New Delhi, Berlin or Madrid (hybrid)

Springer Nature Ltd

  • Postdoctoral Fellow Postdoctoral Fellow focus on ferroic smart materials: shape-memory alloys, piezoelectric ceramics, and magnetostrictive materials, etc Ningbo, Zhejiang (CN) Center for Advanced Smart Materials (CASM), Yongjiang Laboratory (Y-Lab)

Postdoctoral Fellow

Postdoctoral Fellow focus on ferroic smart materials: shape-memory alloys, piezoelectric ceramics, and magnetostrictive materials, etc

Ningbo, Zhejiang (CN)

Center for Advanced Smart Materials (CASM), Yongjiang Laboratory (Y-Lab)

  • Principal Investigator/ Associate Professor PI & Associate Professor class focus on innovative research about ferroic smart materials or technology transfer Ningbo, Zhejiang (CN) Center for Advanced Smart Materials (CASM), Yongjiang Laboratory (Y-Lab)

Principal Investigator/ Associate Professor

PI & Associate Professor class focus on innovative research about ferroic smart materials or technology transfer

Ningbo, Zhejiang (CN)

Center for Advanced Smart Materials (CASM), Yongjiang Laboratory (Y-Lab)

  • Open-Rank Faculty Position in Basic Biomedical Research WashU Medicine’s Dept of Anesthesiology seeks applicants for a tenure-track or tenured faculty position in the Division of Basic Research. Saint Louis, Missouri WashU Medicine - Anesthesiology

Open-Rank Faculty Position in Basic Biomedical Research

WashU Medicine’s Dept of Anesthesiology seeks applicants for a tenure-track or tenured faculty position in the Division of Basic Research.

Saint Louis, Missouri

WashU Medicine - Anesthesiology

The text above was extracted automatically from the source page and may miss images, tables or code blocks. The original is authoritative.

Published by Nature
This site only summarises and aggregates; copyright stays with the original author. Headlines and summaries follow the source — where they differ, the original wins.
Read the original ↗